Abstract

Three numerical methods, iterative finite difference (FD), split-step, and iterative split-step beam propagation methods (BPM's), for modeling second-order nonlinear effects are evaluated. All three methods are able to handle the depletion of the pump wave. The evaluation shows that both iterative methods are more accurate than the split-step method. In addition, the iterative split-step method, even with its iterative nature, is more efficient than the split-step one. Between the two iterative methods, further comparisons indicate that, for a small stepsize, both have comparable accuracy. As the stepsize increases, the iterative split-step method is not as accurate as the iterative finite-difference one. However, the former method has a higher efficiency, suggesting that it is a better choice when the stepsize has to be small because of, for example, the quasiphase-matched geometrical configuration.

[IEEE ]

A modeling of dispersive tensorial second-order nonlinear effects for the finite-difference time-domain method

B. N. Carnio and A. Y. Elezzabi
Opt. Express 27(16) 23432-23445 (2019)

Numerical simulation of nonlinear second harmonic wave generation by the finite difference frequency domain method

Tamas Szarvas and Zsolt Kis
J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 35(4) 731-740 (2018)

Finite-difference beam-propagation method for anisotropic waveguides with torsional birefringence

Xiuquan Ma, Shicheng Zhu, Li Li, Jinyan Li, Xinyu Shao, and Almants Galvanauskas
Opt. Express 26(4) 3995-4003 (2018)

Generalized rectangular finite difference beam propagation method

Slawomir Sujecki
Appl. Opt. 47(23) 4280-4286 (2008)

Modified finite-difference beam-propagation method based on the Douglas scheme

Lizhong Sun and Gar Lam Yip
Opt. Lett. 18(15) 1229-1231 (1993)